Three months after the decision, Philip B. This is primarily because the Urban League has been joined in its quest for zoning changes by developers seeking a realistic opportunity to build low and moderate income housing at a profit. However, as a result of Mount Laurel II, the focal point of this *176 litigation has shifted and the case in its present form bears little resemblance to the pre-1983 lawsuit. The first dozen years of this controversy, from the filing of the Complaint in February 1972 to publication of the Mount Laurel II opinion on January 20, 1983, are chronicled in the Supreme Court decision. O'Rourke for plaintiff-intervenor High Debi Hills Corp. MacIsaac for plaintiffs-intervenors Franklin Commons West and Ridge Gardens. Banks for plaintiff-intervenor Franklin Commons East. (Bannon, Rawding, Nulty & McDonald, attorneys).įrank Holahan for plaintiff-intervenor Emsey-McBride (Harwood, Lloyd, Ryan, Coyle & McBride, attorneys). Nulty for plaintiff-intervenor Beaver Creek, Inc. *175 Richard Bellman for plaintiff (Steel & Bellman, attorneys).Į. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Bergen County. TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH, BOROUGH OF RAMSEY, NEW JERSEY, BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, NEW JERSEY AND BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.īEAVER CREEK, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORP., EMSEY-MC BRIDE, A JOINT VENTURE FRANKLIN COMMONS EAST, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP FRANKLIN COMMONS WEST, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP AND HIGH DEBI HILLS CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-INTERVENORS. URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY, NORTH JERSEY COMMUNITY UNION, AMY INGRAM, JOHN LIGON AND JOSE MUNIZ, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |